The recent Quentin Tarantino movie, Once Upon A Time in Hollywood, is a complete reversal of the Sharon Tate murder. In it, two fictional characters, Cliff Booth and Rick Dalton, prevent actress Sharon Tate’s death on August 9, 1969. This fictional narrative includes Charles Manson, an actual person, in its plot.
Sharon Tate’s murder created social and cultural upheaval that reverberates to this day. As a result, Hollywood residents to upgrade their security arrangement, invested in guns and dogs. Also, it marked a critical turning point in the hippie movement. Tarantino developed its script in a half-decade to depict Hollywood’s less known side.
How did the name Once Upon a Time in Hollywood come from?
Movie buffs know Tarantino’s fondness for the western genre of films. In the past, he has directed various movies in this genre, including Once Upon a Time in America and Once Upon A Time in the West. With this project, Tarantino pays homage to Sergio Leone, an Italian director.
Is Once Upon A Time in Hollywood historically accurate?
Surprisingly, the movie differs significantly from what is known about the Tate-LaBianca murders. First, the movie’s actors are both fictional persons. Despite the movie’s success, it has received a lot of criticism for its treatment of history, given its use of real-life figures to move its narrative forward. Among historical figures in the movie there are Bruce Lee, Roman Polanski, Sharon Tate, and the Manson Family. However, it has some credible recreation of the late 60s. Although Tarantino got these scenes accurate to a certain degree, the movie deviates in several significant aspects.
As a result, it has fueled consternation among critics and movie fans around its some critical elements. This occurs at a time when Tarantino’s genius as a director has tanked due to his off-screen controversies. Most importantly, why is Once Upon A Time in Hollywood a proved controversial? Some objections to Once Upon A Time stem from Tarantino’s portrayal of women. Another reason involves the generic and casual writing style of the script’s historical narrative. And a third contention relates to his fictional treatment of Bruce Lee.
Nevertheless, Once Upon A Time reinforces the perception that heterosexual white males still dominate Hollywood’s creative forces. So, let us address the various ways in which the movie fails to live up to history.
How does Once Upon A Time in Hollywood disrespect Bruce Lee?
Arguably, the directors’ representation of Bruce Lee mocks the most successful Asian American actor of the era it's setting. In turn, this has created controversy between Tarantino and Lee’s surviving family members. Besides that, it trashes his compliments.
By depicting Bruce Lee as cockier than he was, Tarantino succeeds to portray him as a bigger jеrk than he was in real life. Even if the events between Bruce Lee and Cliff happened, the directors resorting to embellishments in Once Upon A Time prevents viewers from understanding the reality of the ‘60s.
For this reason, Tarantino offers a different representation of Asian Americans on the big screen. In watching Once Upon A Time, the audience fails to appreciate Lee’s struggle against the prevalent discrimination in America during the 1960s. This aspect of the movie comes across as a feeble attempt at recreating the spirit of the era its narrative is based on. This leads us into the second argument.
Will understanding the Manson murders help you comprehend Once Upon A Time in Hollywood better?
If you are not conversant with the Sharon Tate-LaBianca murders, and their meaning to pop culture, then, it is hard to comprehend the significance of Once Upon A Time. Tarantino’s immerses viewers into the Hollywood of the ‘60s through his compelling retelling of events leading up to the Manson murders. But what if you did not know about the Sharon Tate-LaBianca murders?
At first, this might not seem a controversial thing in itself. Also, a few people may regard this fact as silly as well. Even so, it is a valid concern, as the film’s entire plot and thematic content revolve around this event. A core idea in Once Upon A Time is that it is a fairy tale that unfolds resulting in one of the most horrific murders to ever happen in Tinseltown. Accordingly, Tarantino ports this event into the world of movies where, in typical fashion, heroes save the world from villains.
However, Tarantino’ deviation into fantasy land is outrageous as it subverts the reality. In the end, the movie is a narrative that celebrates Cliff and Rick’s aggressive treatment of hippies and women. What is more, its portrayal of women is so thin, that for most audiences, its subversion of history cannot stand under scrutiny.
Really, though, why does Once Upon A Time in Hollywood hate women?
Following its release to audiences worldwide, the most brutal criticism of the film pertains to the amount of dialogue women make in it. But how does Once Upon A Time in Hollywood portray women? Different views regarding why Once Upon A Time has female actors speaking less often than their male counterparts, appear. One interesting theory posits that his fans are annoying. Although the director is not responsible for his fan’s behavior, how he handles violence against women in his films is a cause of concern.
Additionally, other of his films are notorious for their portrayal of horrific and humorous incidences of violence against women. This reveals Tarantino’s tendency to test an audience’s ability to stomach taboo subjects. On a more serious note, he is known to use the n-word consistently across his past projects.
Given the above discussion, it is okay if you do not like Once Upon A Time in Hollywood. As such, the film causes mixed feelings in viewers regarding the accuracy of its historical narrative. The debate surrounding the movie indicates that most viewers prefer easily digestible content. Even though this debate has its own place and time, audiences should occasionally be challenged.