Istanbul mayor who upstaged Erdogan faces political ban

Istanbul's popular mayor faces the threat of being banned from politics on Wednesday in a trial stemming from his surprise election victory over an ally of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in 2019.

Ekrem Imamoglu's fate is being watched closely for signs of judicial independence nine months before a general election in which Erdogan will struggle to extend his two-decade rule.

The 52-year-old Imamoglu is the most internationally recognised of the opposition leaders who might run against Erdogan.

He also has the most intense personal rivalry with the powerful Turkish leader.

Imamoglu was stripped of his narrow March 2019 win over the ruling party's candidate after Erdogan -- who launched his own career as Istanbul mayor and viewed the city as his second home -- refused to recognise the result.

Read also

Man sets himself on fire near Japan PM's office: local media

Elections officials reported discovering hundreds of thousands of "suspicious votes" after Imamoglu had been sworn into office.

Their decision to call a re-run election for that June sparked global condemnation and mobilised a groundswell of support for Imamoglu that included former ruling party voters.

Imamoglu won the second election by more than 800,000 votes.

But the usually soft-spoken mayor let his lingering bitterness at the ruling party spill over in November 2019.

"Those who cancelled the March 31 election are idiots," he told reporters at the time.

Appeals process

Erdogan's ruling AKP party seized on the remark and sued the mayor for "insulting" public officials.

Prosecutors have asked for Imamoglu to be banned from politics and jailed for 15 months -- a relatively light sentence that almost never sees people put behind bars.

Read also

Iran dissidents file new lawsuit against Raisi in US

Defence lawyer Kemal Polat told AFP the mayor would immediately appeal against any ban and keep his job while the case wound its way through the courts.

"Imamoglu can remain in his current position as mayor until the end of the appeals process. He would not have to resign," Polat said.

The mayor was due to appear in court on Wednesday to hear the verdict.

Turkey's Western allies accuse Erdogan of undermining the independence of the courts and using them against political opponents following a failed military putsch in 2016.

Erdogan responded to the coup attempt with sweeping purges that saw thousands jailed on "terrorism" and other charges.

Everyone from human rights leaders and civil servants to opposition politicians -- many of them from the main pro-Kurdish party -- were jailed in mass trials that instilled fear across swathes of Turkish society.

Knockout

The West sternly urged Erdogan to abide by European court rulings demanding the release of several of his rivals.

Read also

Matteo and Giorgia: Italy's far-right rivals set for power

Turkey's status as a strategic member of NATO and a Muslim-majority democracy in a volatile part of the world has helped to preserve Erdogan's ties with the West.

But the saga over the 2019 vote turned Imamoglu into a global figure whose sentencing could raise the diplomatic stakes ahead of next year's vote.

The court case comes with Turkey's fractured opposition parties still arguing over which candidate to field against Erdogan next June.

Imamoglu and Mansur Yavas -- elected mayor of Ankara in 2019 -- have emerged as two of the more popular opposition options because of their success at the ballot box.

Polls show both Imamoglu and Yavas beating Erdogan in a run-off election that would be called if no one picked up 50 percent of the vote in the first round.

Imamoglu's office accused the ruling party of trying to "eliminate him from the upcoming elections".

Some political analysts agree.

Read also

Iranian woman's death galvanises critics of 'morality police'

"The authorities could be tempted to knock (Imamoglu) out of the race," said analyst Sinan Ulgen of the Istanbul-based Edam research institute.

"The opposition would then find its hands tied because it cannot take the risk of calling for protests for fear of legitimising the possible repressions that would follow," he explained.

Source: AFP