Russia's Election Was Mockery Of Democracy, Putin's Experts Say

Russia's Election Was Mockery Of Democracy, Putin's Experts Say

  • President Vladimir Putin secured a landslide victory in Russia's 2024 presidential election, solidifying his stronghold on power
  • The election process was marred by accusations of fraud and intimidation, with many analysts viewing it as a move to legitimise Putin's controversial actions
  • Independent observers, including the Russian vote monitoring group Golos, criticised the election as fraudulent and corrupt
  • NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and PACE President Theodoros Rousopoulos both questioned the legitimacy of the election

President Vladimir Putin has extended his firm grip over power in Russia with victory in the 2024 presidential election.

Russian president Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin waving at supporters.
Russian President Vladimir Putin waves while visiting the Victory Day Red Square Parade in 2023 in Moscow. Photo: Contributor.
Source: Getty Images

Putin's victory at the polls was never in doubt, with most analysts viewing it as a process meant to legitimise his controversial actions in recent years.

The lead-up to the polls has been considered one of the harshest crackdowns on dissent since Soviet times.

Read also

Polish farmers block roads in new Ukraine imports protest

Presidential candidates were disqualified from this year's polls under various laws as Putin ensured nobody threatened his fifth term in office.

Russia’s Central Election Commission said Monday, March 18, that with all the precincts counted, Putin got 87% of the vote.

The Central Election Commission chief, Ella Pamfilova, said that nearly 76 million voters cast their ballots in favour of the incumbent.

In power since the last day of 1999, he is now on course to become the longest-serving Russian leader in more than two centuries.

Election observers rubbish Russian polls

An independent Russian vote monitoring group, Golos, described the vote as the most fraudulent and corrupt in Russia's history.

Golos, which means voice, said the three-day election could not be considered genuine since the campaigns took place in a situation where articles of the Russian Constitution were being disregarded.

Read also

France faces high-risk vote on EU-Canada free trade deal

"Never before have we seen a presidential campaign that fell so far short of constitutional standards," said the group.

According to the observer group, Golos said examples of voter intimidation included the presence of law enforcement officers in polling stations.

They said there were cases where heavily armed officers peered over voters' shoulders to read their ballots.

There were scattered incidents of protests at polling stations, with some disgruntled Russians setting fire to voting booths or pouring green dye into ballot boxes.

NATO discredits Russia's election

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has also cast doubt on the credibility of the Russian election.

During a news conference in Tbilisi, Georgia, Stoltenberg said Russian elections were neither legal nor fair.

He further chided the Putin administration for holding elections in occupied territories, terming it completely illegal.

"Russia's organisation of elections in occupied parts of Georgia and Ukraine is completely illegal and Russia's presidential election was clearly neither free nor fair. Georgia is facing complex security challenges. Russia persists in its pursuit of its imperial ambitions, and in Ukraine, the situation on the battlefield remains difficult. So, it is vital that we continue to step up our support," he said.

Read also

Pakistan interior minister urges new laws for online speech

Subscribe to watch new videos

Elections in occupied territories

Ahead of the elections, women with name tags and huge stacks of papers have been knocking on every door in the Russia-occupied parts of four Ukrainian regions.

Russian servicemen stand guard during voting in occupied territories.
The elections in occupied Ukrainian Melitopol were held under the supervision of armed Russian soldiers. Photo: Maria Dziubina.
Source: UGC

Al Jazeera reported that they asked residents for their IDs and nudged them to fill in an early ballot form with the names of four candidates in Russia’s presidential election.

The Ukrainians rarely refused to fill in the ballot for a very persuasive reason, a masked, gun-toting Russian serviceman towering next to the official and a car filled with more armed men nearby.

"There’s no secrecy of vote," a former resident of Mariupol told Al Jazeera, speaking about how her friends and relatives voted.

Putin's legitimacy questioned

Following the Russian presidential election, Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) President Theodoros Rousopoulos said the polls lacked legitimacy.

In a statement, Rousopoulos pointed out that all hallmarks of democratic elections had been disregarded, adding the opposition had been silenced.

Read also

Ukraine 'hacktivists' fighting Russia on digital front

"There were no genuine alternative candidates, no free media, no credible observers present. Civil society has been silenced. And above all, this election has also been conducted on the illegally occupied and annexed territory of Ukraine. All political opposition has been brutally suppressed, and any critics of the regime are either imprisoned or have been forced out of the country," he said.

He urged the European community not to recognise Putin’s legitimacy as president.

We call on them to cease all contact with Putin, except in the pursuit of peace and for humanitarian purposes, for example in organising prisoner exchanges or to bring home the lost children of Ukraine," he added.

Electoral Commission Stops Use Of Indelible Ink During Elections Because Of Biometric Technology

YEN.com.gh earlier reported that the Electoral Commission plans to end the use of indelible ink during elections to check double voting.

Read also

Success and setbacks: 100 days of Argentina's Milei

The Electoral Commission's chairperson said the move from using indelible ink is because of biometric technology.

The Electoral Commission proposed closing polls during the 2024 election at 3 pm instead of 5 pm. The Commission said it would reduce voting times by creating additional polling centres.

Source: TUKO.co.ke

Authors:
Berlinda Entsie avatar

Berlinda Entsie (Copy Editor) Berlinda Entsie is a Copy Editor at YEN.com.gh. She has worked as a proofreader and editor since 2016. Berlinda has over 5 years' experience editing and writing for leading publications in Ghana. She previously worked with Graphic Communications Group LTD, Business Insider SSA and Pulse.com.gh. She obtained a B.A in English Studies from the Methodist University College in 2016 and a Diploma in Broadcast Journalism from the GH Media School in 2019. Reach out to her via berlinda.entsie@yen.com.gh

Augustine Fenuku avatar

Augustine Fenuku Augustine Fenuku has over 5 years of experience in SMM and journalism and serves as the Entertainment Assistant at YEN. His academic qualifications include a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from the University of Ghana, Legon. Augustine Fenuku has contributed his expertise to many brands. Email: augustine.fenuku@yen.com.gh