BHP denies responsibility for 2015 Brazil mine disaster at London trial

BHP denies responsibility for 2015 Brazil mine disaster at London trial

The London trial is determining liability in the 2015 Brazil dam collapse
The London trial is determining liability in the 2015 Brazil dam collapse. Photo: BENJAMIN CREMEL / AFP
Source: AFP

PAY ATTENTION: NOW You can COMMENT on our articles on the YEN website! Learn how to get started.

Australian mining giant BHP on Wednesday denied responsibility for a 2015 dam collapse in Brazil, one of the country's worst environmental disasters, as it opened its defence at the High Court in London.

The months-long trial will determine whether BHP is liable for the rupture at the Fundao tailing dam in Brazil that killed 19 people and unleashed a deluge of thick toxic mud into villages, fields, rainforest, rivers and the ocean.

More than 620,000 complainants, including 46 Brazilian municipalities, companies and indigenous peoples, are seeking an estimated £36 billion ($47 million) in damages in the civil trial.

The company's lawyer Shaheed Fatima argued BHP cannot be held as the "direct polluter" as the dam was managed by Samarco, co-owned by BHP and Brazilian miner Vale.

The tragedy in the town of Mariana unleashed almost 45 million cubic metres of highly toxic mining waste sludge, flooding 39 towns and leaving more than 600 people homeless.

Read also

Cattle disease wreaks havoc in Libya

The flood killed thousands of animals and devastated protected tropical rainforest.

According to the victims' lawyers, BHP was aware that an accumulation of toxic sludge, estimated at 1.3 million tonnes per year, far exceeded the annual limit set -- a build-up which they say contributed to the disaster.

BHP's other defence lawyer Daniel Toledano said the complainants have failed to point to "an act or omission from BHP from which the damage would necessarily have followed".

'Permanent effects'

At the time of the disaster, BHP had global headquarters in Britain and Australia.

In opening submissions to the court Monday, the company laid out as a central argument that it "did not own or operate the dam or any related facilities".

A separate case in Brazil has seen Vale and BHP offer to pay almost $30 billion in compensation. This was increased on the eve of the London trial from almost $25 billion.

Read also

Windfall tax backlash menaces Spain's green energy sector

BHP and Vale estimate that more than 430,000 complainants have already received compensation, including more than 200,000 party to the London case.

BHP added that the Renova Foundation, which manages compensation and rehabilitation programmes, has already paid out more than $7.9 billion in emergency aid.

The Australian mining giant has also said that the quality of river water contaminated by the fallout has returned to pre-disaster levels.

However, a scientific paper published this year in the Franco-Brazilian geography review Confins said the dam rupture had caused "permanent effects of pollution" on the river Doce and its coastal plain.

The hearing, set to last until March, must determine BHP's potential liability for the disaster.

If BHP is ruled liable, another trial would take place from October 2026 to determine the damages.

New feature: Сheck out news that is picked for YOU ➡️ click on “Recommended for you” and enjoy!

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.