Supreme Court Rules That Numo Nmashie Family Doesn't Own 72,000 Acre Lands Including Madina, Others

Supreme Court Rules That Numo Nmashie Family Doesn't Own 72,000 Acre Lands Including Madina, Others

  • The Supreme Court has clarified that the Numo Nmashie Family of Teshie cannot claim ownership of 70 villages and 72,000 acres of land due to a 1982 Court of Appeal decision based on fraudulent information
  • The court directed the Lands Commission to nullify all registrations and certificates granted to the family, urging third parties to acknowledge tenancy to the Boi Stool
  • This decision impacts numerous villages in the Greater Accra Region, reshaping the dynamics of land ownership

The Supreme Court has definitively ruled that the Numo Nmashie Family of Teshie in the Greater Accra Region cannot assert ownership over 70 villages spanning more than 72,000 acres of land.

The Chief Justice, Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Torkornoo, leading a five-member panel, affirmed that the family's claim was based on fraudulent information presented to the court in a 1982 Court of Appeal decision.

Read also

Minority plans to kick against possible GH¢7 billion tax waiver brought by Akufo-Addo government

According to a report by Graphic.com.gh, the court directed the Lands Commission to revoke all registrations and certificates granted to the Numo Nmashie Family and the Tetteh Olewolon Family concerning the vast land.

Supreme Court of Ghana
Ghana's Supreme Court rules on land issues Photo credit: Getty Images, Facebook/@Supreme Court of Ghana
Source: UGC

Furthermore, the judgment requires third parties holding possession or title through the Numo Nmashie Family to acknowledge tenancy to the Boi Stool and relevant families.

Numerous towns, including Madina, Adenta, Peduase, Obuom, Nsakye, and Adenkrebi, among many others, are affected by this decision.

The affected families are now compelled to recognize the authority of the Boi Stool, a consequential development in the region's land tenure landscape.

Supreme Court rejects plea to halt Parliament's consideration of anti-LGBTQ bill

Months ago, the Supreme Court declined a request by two plaintiffs to prevent Parliament from passing the anti-LGBTQ bill.

The apex court, presided over by Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo, expressed its lack of conviction that ordering Parliament to cease the bill's consideration was necessary based on the presented facts.

New feature: Сheck out news that is picked for YOU ➡️ click on “Recommended for you” and enjoy!

Source: YEN.com.gh

Authors:
Ebenezer Agbey Quist avatar

Ebenezer Agbey Quist (HOD Human-Interest) Ebenezer Agbey Quist is the Head of the Human Interest Desk at YEN.com.gh. He has a BSc in Chemical Engineering from KNUST (2017) with 8 years of experience as a writer and 3 years as an editor. He has certificates in AFP courses on digital investigation techniques. At YEN.com.gh, Ebenezer has won the Outstanding Achievement for Professional Conduct Award and the Best Human Interest Editor Award. He is also the author of 3 books. You can contact him via ebenezer.quist@yen.com.gh.